MINDMAKERS Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 31, 2010, 01:54:24 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
NB: Spam bots are becoming smarter every day - we had to turn off regular registration. To become member, please send email to Kris Thorisson ([kris'_lastname] att ru dott is).
333 Posts in 96 Topics by 99 Members
Latest Member: peterwit
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  MINDMAKERS Forum
|-+  Projects
| |-+  Message Type Ontology for Cognitive Architectures
| | |-+  Some thoughts on categories
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Some thoughts on categories  (Read 5450 times)
thorisson
Administrator
Newbie
*****
Posts: 26


View Profile Email
« on: June 23, 2006, 09:06:03 AM »

I was leafing through the CMU directories on AI software and related and found a classification of AI issues:

 dai/       Distributed AI
 discover/  Machine Discovery and Data-Mining
 doc/       Documentation and other AI-related notes.
 edu/       Educational Tools
 expert/    Expert Systems and Production Systems
 faq/       AI FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
            postings for comp.ai
 fuzzy/     Fuzzy Logic

It became clear to me that probably most classifications out there are going to mix *methods/techniques* (e.g. ANNs) with *natural phenomena* (e.g. reasoning) and *other issues* (e.g. "the symbolic-subsymbolic debate"). This is precisely *not* what we want the message type ontology to get tangled in. We want MeTOCA to address only *natural phenomena*, bounded by psychological and brain research.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!